Estée Lauder
$105.41 · Serum
Your profile match
Community
Not enough reports yet (0/3).
Not recommended for
Caution
May aggravate: Perioral Dermatitis (Fragrance)
Set up a profile to see which of these apply to you.
Features luminous notes of magnolia, solar gardenia and Turkish rose Grounded by a warm base of woody and musky accords Inspired by the thrill of a modern-day romance Radiant floral eau de parfum
Spray across pulse points. Olfactory Notes Fragrance Family: Floral Top Notes: Magnolia Petals, Maté, Water Lotus. Heart Notes: Magnolia Oil, Solar Gardenia, Turkish Rose. Base Notes: Cedarwood, Sandalwood, Ilumina Musk. Full
Key actives
Alcohol Denat., Fragrance (Parfum), Water\Aqua\Eau, Linalool, Benzyl Salicylate, Hexyl Cinnamal, Citronellol, Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone, Limonene, Hydroxycitronellal, Geraniol, Cinnamyl Alcohol, Citral, Benzyl Alcohol, Coumarin, Isoeugenol, Methyl 2-Octynoate, Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate, Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane, Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate, Red 33 (Ci 17200), Ext. Violet 2 (Ci 60730), Yellow 5 (Ci 19140). For the latest information, it is recommended to review the ingredient list printed on the packaging of the product prior to usage or consumption.
18 studies on 7of this product’s ingredients. These study the ingredient, not this product.
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2003 · n=11,545 · systematic-review
Clinical review of fragrance contact allergy: an estimated 1.7-4.1% of the general population is sensitized to fragrance-mix ingredients and about 10% of patch-tested eczema patients react; fragrance materials occur in 15-100% of cosmetic products; allergy predominates in women with facial or hand eczema.
Environmental Sciences Europe, 2012 · systematic-review
Applied EU CLP hazard-classification criteria (EC 1272/2008) to personal care products: nearly all contained ingredients that would trigger hazard labelling—85% for eye effects and 52% for skin effects (including sensitizers such as fragrance allergens)—yet cosmetics are exempt from CLP labelling, leaving consumers under-informed about these hazards.
Contact Dermatitis, 1997 · systematic-review
Systematic review establishing fragrance as the leading cause of cosmetic contact dermatitis, responsible for 30-45% of cosmetic adverse reactions; covers both irritant (direct keratinocyte damage) and allergic (hapten-driven type IV hypersensitivity) mechanisms; identifies cinnamal, hydroxycitronellal, and oakmoss as top individual allergens
Used this product? Sign in to share your outcome and see what people with your skin reported.
Sign in to add your experienceNo reports yet. Be the first to share your experience.
Community outcomes are self-reported member experiences, shown separately from the evidence score — never blended into it. Educational, not medical advice.